Re: [GIT PULL] ring-buffer: Replace this_cpu_*() with __this_cpu_*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:16:25 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So I don't think the ring-buffer change is necessarily _wrong_, but if
> this is a performance issue, why don't we just fix it up for the
> generic case rather than for just one user?

I totally agree with your analysis, but it's up to Christoph to come up
with an answer to your questions.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]