Re: [PATCH-v2 1/2] fs: make sure the timestamps for lazytime inodes eventually get written

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:33:37AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Yes, something like this should be possible. But I wanted that to happen
> as a separate patch once we have everything working correctly. The code is
> subtle enough that I didn't want Ted to complicate it with further
> optimizations initially.

Yes, agreed, I took a closer look at it and making the change that
Andreas suggested is more complicated than it first seems.

We can try to fix this later, but it's definitely messy.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]