3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrew Elble <aweits@xxxxxxx>
commit c876486be17aeefe0da569f3d111cbd8de6f675d upstream.
commit 2d4a532d385f ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is
protected by clp->cl_lock") removed the use of the reaplist to
clean out clp->cl_revoked. It failed to change list_entry() to
walk clp->cl_revoked.next instead of reaplist.next
Fixes: 2d4a532d385f ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock")
Reported-by: Eric Meddaugh <etmsys@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Eric Meddaugh <etmsys@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble <aweits@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp
nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) {
- dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
+ dp = list_entry(clp->cl_revoked.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru);
list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru);
nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html