On 3/19/25 5:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 10:37:20AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 3/19/25 10:33 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 at 20:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman >>> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.84 release. >>>> There are 166 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:29:55 +0000. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.84-rc1.gz >>>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> greg k-h >>> >>> Regressions on mips the rt305x_defconfig builds failed with gcc-12 >>> the stable-rc v6.6.83-167-gd16a828e7b09 >>> >>> First seen on the v6.6.83-167-gd16a828e7b09 >>> Good: v6.6.83 >>> Bad: v6.6.83-167-gd16a828e7b09 >>> >>> * mips, build >>> - gcc-12-rt305x_defconfig >>> >>> Regression Analysis: >>> - New regression? Yes >>> - Reproducibility? Yes >>> >>> Build regression: mips implicit declaration of function 'vunmap' >>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Ah that's my fault, forgot to include the backport of: >> >> commit 62346c6cb28b043f2a6e95337d9081ec0b37b5f5 >> Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Sat Mar 16 07:21:43 2024 -0600 >> >> mm: add nommu variant of vm_insert_pages() >> >> for 6.1-stable and 6.6-stable. Greg, can you just cherry pick that one? >> It'll pick cleanly into both, should go before the io_uring mmap series >> obviously. >> >> Sorry about that! I did have it in my local trees, but for some reason >> forgot to include it in the sent in series. > > Wait, this is already in the 6.6.y and 6.1.y queues, so this can't be > the fix. Was there a fixup for that commit somewhere else that I'm > missing? Huh indeed, guess I didn't mess up in the first place. What is going on here indeed... Is that mips config NOMMU yet doesn't link in mm/nommu.o? Checking, and no, it definitely has MMU=y in the config. Guess I should've read the initial report more closely, it's simply missing the vunmap definition. Adding linux/vmalloc.h to io_uring/io_uring.c should fix it. How do we want to deal with this? diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c index 058c89f72e8c..efa7849b82c1 100644 --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ #include <linux/io_uring.h> #include <linux/audit.h> #include <linux/security.h> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h> #include <asm/shmparam.h> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS -- Jens Axboe