Hey this is my bad, I cherry picked the fix to my local 6.1.y, running tests now, should be out for review tomo or friday. Thanks Frank for finding the missing commit! (https://lore.kernel.org/stable/8c6125d7-363c-42b3-bdbb-f802cb8b4408@xxxxxx/) - leah On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 3:25 PM Hardik Garg <hargar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > v6.1.132-rc1 build fails on Azure x86 and arm64 VM: > > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c: In function '__xfs_free_extent_later': > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2551:51: error: 'mp' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'tp'? > 2551 | if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_verify_fsbext(mp, bno, len))) > | ^~ > ./include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' > 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) > | ^ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2551:13: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_IS_CORRUPT' > 2551 | if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_verify_fsbext(mp, bno, len))) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2551:51: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > 2551 | if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_verify_fsbext(mp, bno, len))) > | ^~ > ./include/linux/compiler.h:78:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' > 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) > | ^ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2551:13: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_IS_CORRUPT' > 2551 | if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_verify_fsbext(mp, bno, len))) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from ./fs/xfs/xfs.h:22, > from fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:6: > ./fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:225:63: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value] > 225 | __this_address), \ > | ^ > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:2551:13: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_IS_CORRUPT' > 2551 | if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !xfs_verify_fsbext(mp, bno, len))) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/arpt_mangle.o > CC net/unix/scm.o > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:503: fs/xfs] Error 2 > > > > Tested-by: Hardik Garg <hargar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks, > Hardik > >
