6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 415f135ace7fd824cde083184a922e39156055b5 ] Since rtase_init_ring, which is called within rtase_sw_reset, adds ring entries already present in the ring list back into the list, it causes the ring list to form a cycle. This results in list_for_each_entry_safe failing to find an endpoint during traversal, leading to an error. Therefore, it is necessary to remove the previously added ring_list nodes before calling rtase_init_ring. Fixes: 079600489960 ("rtase: Implement net_device_ops") Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250306070510.18129-1-justinlai0215@xxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c index 14ffd45e9a25a..86dd034fdddc5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c @@ -1501,7 +1501,10 @@ static void rtase_wait_for_quiescence(const struct net_device *dev) static void rtase_sw_reset(struct net_device *dev) { struct rtase_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev); + struct rtase_ring *ring, *tmp; + struct rtase_int_vector *ivec; int ret; + u32 i; netif_stop_queue(dev); netif_carrier_off(dev); @@ -1512,6 +1515,13 @@ static void rtase_sw_reset(struct net_device *dev) rtase_tx_clear(tp); rtase_rx_clear(tp); + for (i = 0; i < tp->int_nums; i++) { + ivec = &tp->int_vector[i]; + list_for_each_entry_safe(ring, tmp, &ivec->ring_list, + ring_entry) + list_del(&ring->ring_entry); + } + ret = rtase_init_ring(dev); if (ret) { netdev_err(dev, "unable to init ring\n"); -- 2.39.5