> > So, it looks definitely more complicated (and fragile?), but I think I > still like it better. Maybe you could add a comment in the code > documenting the two different paths and the associated checks, so that we > don't forget. :) Sent the v2 with this approach: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250317022325.52791-1-harshit@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u Please take a look. Thanks, Harshit
