5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 90ac908a418b836427d6eaf84fbc5062881747fd ]
Rearrange a conditional to make it more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 8e461a1cb43d ("cpufreq: schedutil: Fix superfluous updates caused by need_freq_update")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 5e39da0ae0868..04295212ab500 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -102,12 +102,10 @@ static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
static bool sugov_update_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
unsigned int next_freq)
{
- if (!sg_policy->need_freq_update) {
- if (sg_policy->next_freq == next_freq)
- return false;
- } else {
+ if (sg_policy->need_freq_update)
sg_policy->need_freq_update = cpufreq_driver_test_flags(CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS);
- }
+ else if (sg_policy->next_freq == next_freq)
+ return false;
sg_policy->next_freq = next_freq;
sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
--
2.39.5
