On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:22:24PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote: > Am Montag, 10. März 2025, 18:23:02 CET schrieb Mark Brown: > > > + BUG_ON(!r); > > This doesn't actually help anything > My idea was to help identifying the problem (if it is reintroduced again > later). > > I'd expect this to trigger probe deferral. > I can check for this tomorrow. But is it worth to use deferred probing > for a shared "NOP" driver which doesn't access any hardware? Or would this > only introduce overhead for nothing? My concern is that if something goes wrong in production then we've just escallated the problem, given that there's a clear error handling mechanism we could use we should take advantage of that rather than doing something destructive.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
