On 3/7/25 07:58, Florent Revest wrote: > One thing I'm not entirely sure about is that > for_each_node_with_cpus() is implemented on top of > for_each_online_node(). This differs from the current code which uses > for_each_node(). I can't tell if iterating over offline nodes is a bug > or a feature of load_microcode_amd() so this would be an extra change > to the business logic which I can't really explain/justify. Actually, the per-node caches seem to have gone away at some point too. Boris would know the history. This might need a a cleanup like Boris alluded to in 05e91e7211383. This might not even need a nid loop.
