On 6.3.2025 16.52, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:49:42PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: Why is a patch cc: stable burried here in a series for linux-next? It will be many many weeks before it gets out to anyone else, is that intentional? Same for the other commit in this series tagged that way.
These are both kind of half theoretical issues that have been around for years without more complaints. No need to rush them to stable. Balance between regression risk vs adding them to stable. This patch for example states: "I had no luck producing this sequence of completion events so there is no compelling demonstration of any resulting disaster. It may be a very rare, obscure condition. The sole motivation for this patch is that if such unlikely event does occur, I'd rather risk reporting a cancelled partially done isoc frame as empty than gamble with UA" Thanks Mathias
