On 3/3/25 12:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 4:43 AM Haoxiang Li <haoxiang_li2024@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Replace kfree() with em_table_free() to free
the memory allocated by em_table_alloc().
Ostensibly, this is fixing a problem, but there's no problem described
above. Please describe it.
Thank Rafael for adding me on CC.
Fixes: 24e9fb635df2 ("PM: EM: Remove old table")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <haoxiang_li2024@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/power/energy_model.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
index 3874f0e97651..71b60aa20227 100644
--- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
+++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
return 0;
free_pd_table:
- kfree(em_table);
+ em_table_free(em_table);
free_pd:
kfree(pd);
return -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
IMO there is no need to use RCU freeing mechanism, since
this table is not used yet. We failed in the initialization
steps, so we can simply call kfree() on that memory.
That 'free_pd_table' goto label is triggered before the call to:
rcu_assign_pointer(pd->em_table, em_table);
IMO this is even dangerous in the patch to abuse RCU free for such case.
Regards,
Lukasz
