[PATCH] x86_32, traps: Fix user_mode misuses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The one in do_debug is probably harmless, but better safe than
sorry.  The one in do_bounds is less harmless.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 88900e288021..89f4e64c2cea 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 		goto exit;
 	conditional_sti(regs);
 
-	if (!user_mode(regs))
+	if (!user_mode_vm(regs))
 		die("bounds", regs, error_code);
 
 	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_MPX)) {
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_debug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	 * then it's very likely the result of an icebp/int01 trap.
 	 * User wants a sigtrap for that.
 	 */
-	if (!dr6 && user_mode(regs))
+	if (!dr6 && user_mode_vm(regs))
 		user_icebp = 1;
 
 	/* Catch kmemcheck conditions first of all! */
-- 
2.3.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]