The patch titled
Subject: Revert "mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone"
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch. Its filename is
revert-mm-page_allocc-dont-show-protection-in-zones-lowmem_reserve-for-empty-zone.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/revert-mm-page_allocc-dont-show-protection-in-zones-lowmem_reserve-for-empty-zone.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Revert "mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone"
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 22:22:58 -0500
Commit 96a5c186efff ("mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's
->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone") removes the protection of lower zones
from allocations targeting memory-less high zones. This had an unintended
impact on the pattern of reclaims because it makes the high-zone-targeted
allocation more likely to succeed in lower zones, which adds pressure to
said zones. I.e, the following corresponding checks in
zone_watermark_ok/zone_watermark_fast are less likely to trigger:
if (free_pages <= min + z->lowmem_reserve[highest_zoneidx])
return false;
As a result, we are observing an increase in reclaim and kswapd scans, due
to the increased pressure. This was initially observed as increased
latency in filesystem operations when benchmarking with fio on a machine
with some memory-less zones, but it has since been associated with
increased contention in locks related to memory reclaim. By reverting
this patch, the original performance was recovered on that machine.
The original commit was introduced as a clarification of the
/proc/zoneinfo output, so it doesn't seem there are usecases depending on
it, making the revert a simple solution.
For reference, I collected vmstat with and without this patch on a freshly
booted system running intensive randread io from an nvme for 5 minutes. I
got:
rpm-6.12.0-slfo.1.2 -> pgscan_kswapd 5629543865
Patched -> pgscan_kswapd 33580844
33M scans is similar to what we had in kernels predating this patch.
These numbers is fairly representative of the workload on this machine, as
measured in several runs. So we are talking about a 2-order of magnitude
increase.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250226032258.234099-1-krisman@xxxxxxx
Fixes: 96a5c186efff ("mm/page_alloc.c: don't show protection in zone's ->lowmem_reserve[] for empty zone")
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~revert-mm-page_allocc-dont-show-protection-in-zones-lowmem_reserve-for-empty-zone
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -5851,11 +5851,10 @@ static void setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserv
for (j = i + 1; j < MAX_NR_ZONES; j++) {
struct zone *upper_zone = &pgdat->node_zones[j];
- bool empty = !zone_managed_pages(upper_zone);
managed_pages += zone_managed_pages(upper_zone);
- if (clear || empty)
+ if (clear)
zone->lowmem_reserve[j] = 0;
else
zone->lowmem_reserve[j] = managed_pages / ratio;
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from krisman@xxxxxxx are
revert-mm-page_allocc-dont-show-protection-in-zones-lowmem_reserve-for-empty-zone.patch
