Re: [PATCH] mm: fix finish_fault() handling for large folios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.02.25 15:03, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:48:15AM -0500, Brian Geffon wrote:
When handling faults for anon shmem finish_fault() will attempt to install
ptes for the entire folio. Unfortunately if it encounters a single
non-pte_none entry in that range it will bail, even if the pte that
triggered the fault is still pte_none. When this situation happens the
fault will be retried endlessly never making forward progress.

This patch fixes this behavior and if it detects that a pte in the range
is not pte_none it will fall back to setting just the pte for the
address that triggered the fault.

Surely there's a similar problem in do_anonymous_page()?

I recall we handle it in there correctly the last time I stared at it.

We check pte_none to decide which folio size we can allocate (including basing the decision on other factors like VMA etc), and after retaking the PTL, we recheck vmf_pte_changed / pte_range_none() to make sure there were no races.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux