6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3e5796862c692ea608d96f0a1437f9290f44953a ]
This patch fixes a bug in TC flower filter where rules combining a
specific destination port with a source port range weren't working
correctly.
The specific case was when users tried to configure rules like:
tc filter add dev ens38 ingress protocol ip flower ip_proto udp \
dst_port 5000 src_port 2000-3000 action drop
The root cause was in the flow dissector code. While both
FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS and FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE flags
were being set correctly in the classifier, the __skb_flow_dissect_ports()
function was only populating one of them: whichever came first in
the enum check. This meant that when the code needed both a specific
port and a port range, one of them would be left as 0, causing the
filter to not match packets as expected.
Fix it by removing the either/or logic and instead checking and
populating both key types independently when they're in use.
Fixes: 8ffb055beae5 ("cls_flower: Fix the behavior using port ranges with hw-offload")
Reported-by: Qiang Zhang <dtzq01@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAPx+-5uvFxkhkz4=j_Xuwkezjn9U6kzKTD5jz4tZ9msSJ0fOJA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Cc: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250218043210.732959-2-xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/flow_dissector.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
index 5db41bf2ed93e..c33af3ef0b790 100644
--- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
@@ -853,23 +853,30 @@ __skb_flow_dissect_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb,
void *target_container, const void *data,
int nhoff, u8 ip_proto, int hlen)
{
- enum flow_dissector_key_id dissector_ports = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_MAX;
- struct flow_dissector_key_ports *key_ports;
+ struct flow_dissector_key_ports_range *key_ports_range = NULL;
+ struct flow_dissector_key_ports *key_ports = NULL;
+ __be32 ports;
if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS))
- dissector_ports = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS;
- else if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
- FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
- dissector_ports = FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE;
+ key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
+ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS,
+ target_container);
- if (dissector_ports == FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_MAX)
+ if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector, FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE))
+ key_ports_range = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
+ FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE,
+ target_container);
+
+ if (!key_ports && !key_ports_range)
return;
- key_ports = skb_flow_dissector_target(flow_dissector,
- dissector_ports,
- target_container);
- key_ports->ports = __skb_flow_get_ports(skb, nhoff, ip_proto,
- data, hlen);
+ ports = __skb_flow_get_ports(skb, nhoff, ip_proto, data, hlen);
+
+ if (key_ports)
+ key_ports->ports = ports;
+
+ if (key_ports_range)
+ key_ports_range->tp.ports = ports;
}
static void
--
2.39.5
