<qh6envvnuw45w2omvpufqtbq5k5343ymdzswxrxmczwoe64d6g@a4z5wjdbdw6w>
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To:
<ah4qm66q5q7we7ykhl3uywgrexi7izdxrmfyn2zm3jhswitebt@cz2ipkdgr6yf>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 05:01:31PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
No, nothing I can think of.
Note however that the comment above vsock_close() ("Dummy callback
required
by sockmap. See unconditional call of saved_close() in
sock_map_close().")
becomes somewhat misleading :)
Yeah, we can mention in the commit description of the backport that we
backport it just to reduce conflicts but sockmap features are not
backported. I'd touch as less as possibile in the patch, otherwise IMHO
is better to just fix the conflicts in the 2 patches.
Thanks,
Stefano
Totally agree with you, will send the backport in a couple of days if
nobody has any objections.
Luigi
