> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 7:43 AM
> [...]
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 net 9/9] net: enetc: fix the off-by-one issue in
> > enetc_map_tx_tso_buffs()
> >
> > There is an off-by-one issue for the err_chained_bd path, it will free
> > one more tx_swbd than expected. But there is no such issue for the
> > err_map_data path. To fix this off-by-one issue and make the two error
> > handling consistent, the loop condition of error handling is modified
> > and the 'count++' operation is moved before enetc_map_tx_tso_data().
> >
> > Fixes: fb8629e2cbfc ("net: enetc: add support for software TSO")
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index 9a24d1176479..fe3967268a19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_tso_buffs(struct enetc_bdr
> > *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb
> > txbd = ENETC_TXBD(*tx_ring, i);
> > tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
> > prefetchw(txbd);
> > + count++;
> >
> > /* Compute the checksum over this segment of data and
> > * add it to the csum already computed (over the L4
> > @@ -848,7 +849,6 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_tso_buffs(struct enetc_bdr
> > *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb
> > goto err_map_data;
> >
> > data_len -= size;
> > - count++;
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> My issue is that:
> enetc_map_tx_tso_hdr() not only updates the current tx_swbd (so 1 count++
> needed), but in case of extension flag it advances 'tx_swbd' and 'i' with
> another
> position so and extra 'count++' would be needed in that case.
>
I think the patch 2 (net: enetc: correct the tx_swbd statistics) is to resolve
your issue.
