6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Radu Rendec <rrendec@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 875d742cf5327c93cba1f11e12b08d3cce7a88d2 ]
The loop that detects/populates cache information already has a bounds
check on the array size but does not account for cache levels with
separate data/instructions cache. Fix this by incrementing the index
for any populated leaf (instead of any populated level).
Fixes: 5d425c186537 ("arm64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information")
Signed-off-by: Radu Rendec <rrendec@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250206174420.2178724-1-rrendec@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 97c42be71338a..1510f457b6154 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -87,16 +87,18 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
unsigned int level, idx;
enum cache_type type;
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
- struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
+ struct cacheinfo *infos = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
for (idx = 0, level = 1; level <= this_cpu_ci->num_levels &&
- idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; idx++, level++) {
+ idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; level++) {
type = get_cache_type(level);
if (type == CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE) {
- ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
- ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+ if (idx + 1 >= this_cpu_ci->num_leaves)
+ break;
+ ci_leaf_init(&infos[idx++], CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
+ ci_leaf_init(&infos[idx++], CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
} else {
- ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, type, level);
+ ci_leaf_init(&infos[idx++], type, level);
}
}
return 0;
--
2.39.5
