6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 1f566840a82982141f94086061927a90e79440e5 ] The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags are set. It is an informational message and so pr_info() is the correct choice. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@xxxxxxxxxx Stable-dep-of: 6bb05a33337b ("clocksource: Use migrate_disable() to avoid calling get_random_u32() in atomic context") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index aa864999dc21b..6b5b7c9c14732 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ void clocksource_verify_percpu(struct clocksource *cs) return; } testcpu = smp_processor_id(); - pr_warn("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); + pr_info("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", + cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen) { if (cpu == testcpu) continue; -- 2.39.5
