> On Feb 11, 2025, at 4:33 PM, Yifei Liu <yifei.l.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 10, 2025, at 10:24 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> A: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!I6O0EcBYMun5zy7pK39ZG9aJYrbv3Uy7IaJYl-fKOXJfmImBbzfXDFfOWeYY2o1JutHPBoAoI_b7xJQyjQ5nnfgv$ >> Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting? >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> A: Top-posting. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? >> >> A: No. >> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? >> > Hi Greg, > Sorry for the top-posting. I will not do that any more. >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!I6O0EcBYMun5zy7pK39ZG9aJYrbv3Uy7IaJYl-fKOXJfmImBbzfXDFfOWeYY2o1JutHPBoAoI_b7xJQyjanSNOhz$ >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:43:49PM +0000, Yifei Liu wrote: >>> Hi Greg, >>> Yes, looks we only need this for linux-6.12.y. Maybe we could use the v1 version which does not include the linux-6.13.y tag. Or I can send a v3 with the linux-6.12.y only. >> >> As you know, we can't take patches for only older kernels and not newer >> ones. Please submit them for all relevant branches, AND test your >> patches before you submit them so that they don't fail on our side, as >> that just wastes our energy :( > For this patch, I believe it failed to apply to linux-6.13 due to another same patch applied before it. Commit d9eb5a1e76f5 ("selftests/mm: build with -O2”) goes into linux-6.13 with tag v6.13.2, last week’s tag. I checked the queue-6.12 and do not see this patch yet for v6.12. I think we still need this for v6.12. About the patch, it fixes a build issue for selftest/mm, which is bacported to v6.12. Thus this patch should only be backported to v6.12. > > I tested it on my device and it works fine and solved the failure of selftest. > Hi Greg, I checked the v6.12.16 tag released last Friday. It does not contain this patch. It looks we will not see the same situation we have for v6.13 like I mentioned above and it’s safe to include this in v6.12. I could resend a v3 with all the linux-6.13.y tags removed if you want. Thank you Yifei > Thank you > Yifei >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h
