On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:07:56PM +0800, Bo Sun wrote: > On 2/10/25 18:37, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 04:24:14PM +0800, Bo Sun wrote: > > > On our Marvell OCTEON CN96XX board, we observed the following panic on > > > the latest kernel: > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000080 > > > Mem abort info: > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000005 > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault > > > Data abort info: > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 > > > GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 > > > [0000000000000080] user address but active_mm is swapper > > > Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > > Modules linked in: > > > CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-00149-g9bffa1ad25b8 #1 > > > Hardware name: Marvell OcteonTX CN96XX board (DT) > > > pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > > pc : of_pci_add_properties+0x278/0x4c8 > > > lr : of_pci_add_properties+0x258/0x4c8 > > > sp : ffff8000822ef9b0 > > > x29: ffff8000822ef9b0 x28: ffff000106dd8000 x27: ffff800081bc3b30 > > > x26: ffff800081540118 x25: ffff8000813d2be0 x24: 0000000000000000 > > > x23: ffff00010528a800 x22: ffff000107c50000 x21: ffff0001039c2630 > > > x20: ffff0001039c2630 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: ffffffffffffffff > > > x17: 00000000a49c1b85 x16: 0000000084c07b58 x15: ffff000103a10f98 > > > x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff000103a10f96 x12: 0000000000000003 > > > x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 000000000000002c x9 : ffff800080ca7acc > > > x8 : ffff0001038fd900 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000696370 > > > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : ffff8000822efa40 > > > x2 : ffff800081341000 x1 : ffff000107c50000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > > > Call trace: > > > of_pci_add_properties+0x278/0x4c8 (P) > > > of_pci_make_dev_node+0xe0/0x158 > > > pci_bus_add_device+0x158/0x210 > > > pci_bus_add_devices+0x40/0x98 > > > pci_host_probe+0x94/0x118 > > > pci_host_common_probe+0x120/0x1a0 > > > platform_probe+0x70/0xf0 > > > really_probe+0xb4/0x2a8 > > > __driver_probe_device+0x80/0x140 > > > driver_probe_device+0x48/0x170 > > > __driver_attach+0x9c/0x1b0 > > > bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xe8 > > > driver_attach+0x2c/0x40 > > > bus_add_driver+0xec/0x218 > > > driver_register+0x68/0x138 > > > __platform_driver_register+0x2c/0x40 > > > gen_pci_driver_init+0x24/0x38 > > > do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x278 > > > kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x3d0 > > > kernel_init+0x28/0x1f0 > > > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > > Code: aa1603e1 f0005522 d2800044 91000042 (f94040a0) > > > > > > This regression was introduced by commit 7246a4520b4b ("PCI: Use > > > preserve_config in place of pci_flags"). On our board, the 002:00:07.0 > > > bridge is misconfigured by the bootloader. Both its secondary and > > > subordinate bus numbers are initialized to 0, while its fixed secondary > > > bus number is set to 8. > > > > What do you mean by 'fixed secondary bus number'? > > > > The 'fixed secondary bus number' refers to the value returned by the > function pci_ea_fixed_busnrs(), which reads the fixed Secondary and > Subordinate bus numbers from the EA (Extended Attributes) capability, if > present. Thanks! It'd be good to mention the EA capability. > In the code at drivers/pci/probe.c, line 1439, we have the > following: > > /* Read bus numbers from EA Capability (if present) */ > fixed_buses = pci_ea_fixed_busnrs(dev, &fixed_sec, &fixed_sub); > if (fixed_buses) > next_busnr = fixed_sec; > else > next_busnr = max + 1; > > > > However, bus number 8 is also assigned to another > > > bridge (0002:00:0f.0). Although this is a bootloader issue, before the > > > change in commit 7246a4520b4b, the PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS flag was > > > set by default when PCI_PROBE_ONLY was enabled, ensuing that all the > > > bus number for these bridges were reassigned, avoiding any conflicts. > > > > > > > Isn't the opposite? PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS was only added if the PCI_PROBE_ONLY > > flag was not set: > > > > /* Do not reassign resources if probe only */ > > if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) > > pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS); > > > > Yes, you are correct. It’s a typo; it should be "when PCI_PROBE_ONLY was not > enabled." I will fix this in v2. > > > > > > After the change introduced in commit 7246a4520b4b, the bus numbers > > > assigned by the bootloader are reused by all other bridges, except > > > the misconfigured 002:00:07.0 bridge. The kernel attempt to reconfigure > > > 002:00:07.0 by reusing the fixed secondary bus number 8 assigned by > > > bootloader. However, since a pci_bus has already been allocated for > > > bus 8 due to the probe of 0002:00:0f.0, no new pci_bus allocated for > > > 002:00:07.0. > > > > How come 0002:00:0f.0 is enumerated before 0002:00:07.0 in a depth first manner? > > > > The device 0002:00:07.0 is actually enumerated before 0002:00:0f.0, but it > appears misconfigured. The kernel attempts to reconfigure it during > initialization, which is where the issue arises. > Ok, thanks for the clarification. I think the bug is in this part of the code: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/probe.c#n1451 It just reuses the fixed bus number even if the bus already exists, which is wrong. I think this should be fixed by evaluating the bus number read from EA capability as below: diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c index b6536ed599c3..097e2a01faae 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1438,10 +1438,21 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, /* Read bus numbers from EA Capability (if present) */ fixed_buses = pci_ea_fixed_busnrs(dev, &fixed_sec, &fixed_sub); - if (fixed_buses) - next_busnr = fixed_sec; - else + if (fixed_buses) { + /* + * If the fixed bus number is already taken, use the + * next available bus number. This can happen if the + * bootloader has assigned a wrong bus number in EA + * capability of the bridge. + */ + child = pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(bus), fixed_sec); + if (child) + next_busnr = max + 1; + else + next_busnr = fixed_sec; + } else { next_busnr = max + 1; + } /* * Prevent assigning a bus number that already exists. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்