Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> prev = list_prev_entry(subreq, rreq_link);
> ...
> + if (subreq->start == prev->start + prev->len) {
> + prev = list_prev_entry(subreq, rreq_link);
Actually, that doubles the setting of prev redundantly. It shouldn't hurt,
but we might want to remove the inner one.
David
