Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] x86/tdx: Route safe halt execution via tdx_safe_halt()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/11/25 00:32, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> If CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is disabled, "sti;hlt" sequences can still get
>> executed from TDX VMs via paths like:
>>         acpi_safe_halt() =>
>>         raw_safe_halt()  =>
>>         arch_safe_halt() =>
>> 	native_safe_halt()
>> There is a long term plan to fix these paths by carving out
>> irq.safe_halt() outside paravirt framework.
> I don't think it is acceptable to keep !PARAVIRT_XXL (read no-Xen) config
> broken.

Oh, I thought it took PARAVIRT_XXL=y to even trigger this issue. Was I
just confused?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux