Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
From: Jared Finder <jared@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 07:18:22 -0800
Cc: gnoack@xxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hanno@xxxxxxxxx, jannh@xxxxxxxxxx, jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <202501100850.5E4D0A5@keescook>

Hi, I'm the original reporter of this regression (noticed because itimpacted GNU Emacs) and I'm wondering if there's any traction oncreating an updated patch? This thread appears to have stalled out. Ihaven't seen any reply for three weeks.


  -- MJF

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
  - From: Greg KH

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
  - From: Kees Cook

Prev by Date: [tip: sched/urgent] sched/fair: Adhere to place_entity() constraints
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: Permit some TIOCL_SETSEL modes without CAP_SYS_ADMIN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux