On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 9:58 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Are you saying you'd prefer that we pick this up on the x86 side? I'm > totally happy to do that, and it's obviously patching x86-specific > sections of the rust scripts. > > If I'm understanding the ask.... Just curious though, what makes that > preferable? It's in a rust-specific file > (scripts/generate_rust_target.rs) and I'd guess that it'd be easier to > take it through the rust tree since it's more likely to collide with > stuff there and also be closer to the folks that can competently resolve > any merge problems. I typically say something like that when I feel I may be overstepping -- I don't want other subsystems to feel that they are being skipped. For x86 I have so far taken things myself, since it was the first Rust arch (so it was an exceptional case), but perhaps you wanted to start handling things on your own etc. I am happy either way, of course. Your Acked-by's would be very welcome! Cheers, Miguel
