[PATCH 6.13 307/623] bpf: Send signals asynchronously if !preemptible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 87c544108b612512b254c8f79aa5c0a8546e2cc4 ]

BPF programs can execute in all kinds of contexts and when a program
running in a non-preemptible context uses the bpf_send_signal() kfunc,
it will cause issues because this kfunc can sleep.
Change `irqs_disabled()` to `!preemptible()`.

Reported-by: syzbot+97da3d7e0112d59971de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67486b09.050a0220.253251.0084.GAE@xxxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: 1bc7896e9ef4 ("bpf: Fix deadlock with rq_lock in bpf_send_signal()")
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250115103647.38487-1-puranjay@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 9f2f65767639d..2c2205e91fee9 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ static int bpf_send_signal_common(u32 sig, enum pid_type type, struct task_struc
 	if (unlikely(is_global_init(task)))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if (irqs_disabled()) {
+	if (!preemptible()) {
 		/* Do an early check on signal validity. Otherwise,
 		 * the error is lost in deferred irq_work.
 		 */
-- 
2.39.5







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux