6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 76260267ba26a6e513acefa5e7de1200fbeb5b5d ]
When handling TX_CMD notification, for mgmt frames tid is equal
to IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT, so with the current logic we'll count
that as MPDU, fix that.
Fixes: ec0d43d26f2c ("wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: Activate EMLSR based on traffic volume")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241229164246.80b119bb5d08.I31b1e8ba25cce15819225e5ac80332e4eaa20c13@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
index c9867d26361b6..998a390a70bbc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
@@ -1880,7 +1880,9 @@ static void iwl_mvm_rx_tx_cmd_single(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(mvm,
"Next reclaimed packet:%d\n",
next_reclaimed);
- iwl_mvm_count_mpdu(mvmsta, sta_id, 1, true, 0);
+ if (tid < IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT)
+ iwl_mvm_count_mpdu(mvmsta, sta_id, 1,
+ true, 0);
} else {
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(mvm,
"NDP - don't update next_reclaimed\n");
--
2.39.5
