On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 16:23, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025, at 10:31, Jens Wiklander wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:00 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why not mutex_lock()? If we fail to acquire the mutex here, we will > > quite likely free the req list item below at the end of this function > > while it remains in the list. > > Right, I had mentioned mutex_lock_killable in an earlier reply, > as I didn't know exactly where it hang. If we know that the > wait_event_interruptible() was causing the hang, then the > normal mutex_lock should be fine. > Yeah for my current test scenario mutex_lock() works fine too but I added mutex_lock_killable() just in another theoretical corner case being stuck acquiring mutex while someone is trying to kill the process. But let's avoid over complexity for the time being with a simpler mutex_lock() approach. -Sumit