Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/94] 5.4.290-rc2 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/1/25 00:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

Anyway, are you all really caring about riscv on a 5.4.y kernel?  Last I
checked, the riscv maintainers said not to even use that kernel for that
architecture.  Do you all have real boards that care about this kernel
tree that you are insisting on keeping alive?  Why not move them to a
newer LTS kernel?


That makes me wonder - is there a list of architectures and/or platforms
which should no longer be tested for older kernels ?

I am sure that could help free up test bed resources, and it would make
exchanges like this unnecessary.

Thanks,
Guenter





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux