Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: account for hotplug memory when randomizing the linear region

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 18:45, Florian Fainelli
<florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/29/25 01:17, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 08:33:12AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/20/2025 5:59 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 07:44:50AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/12/2025 3:54 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 09:01:13AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/9/25 08:54, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >>>>>>> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> commit 97d6786e0669daa5c2f2d07a057f574e849dfd3e upstream
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As a hardening measure, we currently randomize the placement of
> >>>>>>> physical memory inside the linear region when KASLR is in effect.
> >>>>>>> Since the random offset at which to place the available physical
> >>>>>>> memory inside the linear region is chosen early at boot, it is
> >>>>>>> based on the memblock description of memory, which does not cover
> >>>>>>> hotplug memory. The consequence of this is that the randomization
> >>>>>>> offset may be chosen such that any hotplugged memory located above
> >>>>>>> memblock_end_of_DRAM() that appears later is pushed off the end of
> >>>>>>> the linear region, where it cannot be accessed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So let's limit this randomization of the linear region to ensure
> >>>>>>> that this can no longer happen, by using the CPU's addressable PA
> >>>>>>> range instead. As it is guaranteed that no hotpluggable memory will
> >>>>>>> appear that falls outside of that range, we can safely put this PA
> >>>>>>> range sized window anywhere in the linear region.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201014081857.3288-1-ardb@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Forgot to update the patch subject, but this one is for 5.10.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You also forgot to tell us _why_ this is needed :(
> >>>>
> >>>> This is explained in the second part of the first paragraph:
> >>>>
> >>>> The consequence of this is that the randomization offset may be chosen such
> >>>> that any hotplugged memory located above memblock_end_of_DRAM() that appears
> >>>> later is pushed off the end of the linear region, where it cannot be
> >>>> accessed.
> >>>>
> >>>> We use both memory hotplug and KASLR on our systems and that's how we
> >>>> eventually found out about the bug.
> >>>
> >>> And you still have 5.10.y ARM64 systems that need this?  Why not move to
> >>> a newer kernel version already?
> >>
> >> We still have ARM64 systems running 5.4 that need this, and the same bug
> >> applies to 5.10 that we used to support but dropped in favor of 5.15/6.1.
> >> Those are the kernel versions used by Android, and Android TV in particular,
> >> so it's kind of the way it goes for us.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, I need an ack from the ARM64 maintainers that this is ok to
> >>> apply here before I can take it.
> >>
> >> Just out of curiosity, the change is pretty innocuous and simple to review,
> >> why the extra scrutiny needed here?
> >
> > Why shouldn't the maintainers review a proposed backport patch for core
> > kernel code that affects everyone who uses that arch?
>
> They should, but they are not, we can keep sending messages like those
> in the hope that someone does, but clearly that is not working at the
> moment.
>
> This patch cherry picked cleanly into 5.4 and 5.10 maybe they just trust
> whoever submit stable bugfixes to have done their due diligence, too, I
> don't know how to get that moving now but it fixes a real problem we
> observed.
>

FWIW, I understand why this might be useful when running under a
non-KVM hypervisor that relies on memory hotplug to perform resource
balancing between VMs. But the upshot of this change is that existing
systems that do not rely on memory hotplug at all will suddenly lose
any randomization of the linear map if its CPU happens to be able to
address more than ~40 bits of physical memory. So I'm not convinced
this is a change we should make for these older kernels.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux