[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: a97de7bff13b1cc825c1b1344eaed8d6c2d3e695
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Keerthana K<keerthana.kalyanasundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Commit author: Luiz Augusto von Dentz<luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 4ea65e2095e9)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: eea40d33bf93)
5.15.y | Not found
5.10.y | Not found
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: a97de7bff13b1 ! 1: 84bdcbff6c20c Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
Bluetooth: RFCOMM: Fix not validating setsockopt user input
+ [ Upstream commit a97de7bff13b1cc825c1b1344eaed8d6c2d3e695 ]
+
syzbot reported rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old() is copying data without
checking user input length.
@@ Commit message
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@xxxxxxxxx>
+ Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ [Keerthana: No changes from v1
+ link to v1:
+ https://lore.kernel.org/stable/2025012010-manager-dreamlike-b5c1@gregkh/]
+ Signed-off-by: Keerthana K <keerthana.kalyanasundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
## net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c ##
@@ net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c: static int rfcomm_sock_setsockopt_old(struct socket *sock, int optname,
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.10.y | Success | Success |
