Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/hugetlb: pmd_huge() returns true for non-present hugepage" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:53:39AM +0000, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 02:52:35PM -0800, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
> > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> This patch depends on commit 61f77eda9bbf ("mm/hugetlb: reduce arch dependent
> code around follow_huge_*"), but 61f77eda9bbf also conflicts due to the lack
> of other patches like commit 3212b535f200 ("mm: hugetlb: Copy huge_pmd_share
> from x86 to mm.") and commit 53313b2c9130 ("x86: mm: Remove general hugetlb
> code from x86.") and more.
> 
> So there seems no easy way to backport this patch.
> 
> Considering that the race condition fixed by this patch very rarely occurs
> on 3.10, because there's only one user of hugepage migration (soft offline)
> before 3.12, so I think that the risk of leaving this race is small enough
> and acceptable. So I'm OK to skip this backporting.

Ok, thanks for looking into this and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]