Re: [PATCH 6.1] Partial revert of xhci: use pm_ptr() instead #ifdef for CONFIG_PM conditionals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 08:26:02PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your patch.
> 
> FYI: kernel test robot notices the stable kernel rule is not satisfied.
> 
> The check is based on https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-3
> 
> Rule: The upstream commit ID must be specified with a separate line above the commit text.
> Subject: [PATCH 6.1] Partial revert of xhci: use pm_ptr() instead #ifdef for CONFIG_PM conditionals
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20250118122409.4052121-1-re%40w6rz.net
> 
> Please ignore this mail if the patch is not relevant for upstream.

Ron, don't worry about this, it's a false-positive.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux