From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Perf doesn't work with a low freq.
perf record -e cpu_core/instructions/ppp -F 120
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument)
for event (cpu_core/instructions/ppp).
"dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
The limit_period() check avoids a low sampling period on a counter. It
doesn't intend to limit the frequency.
The check in the x86_pmu_hw_config() should be limited to non-freq mode.
The attr.sample_period and attr.sample_freq are union. The
attr.sample_period should not be used to indicate the freq mode.
Fixes: c46e665f0377 ("perf/x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250115154949.3147-1-ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 7b6430e5a77b..20ad5cca6ad2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->attr.type == event->pmu->type)
event->hw.config |= x86_pmu_get_event_config(event);
- if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+ if (!event->attr.freq && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
s64 left = event->attr.sample_period;
x86_pmu.limit_period(event, &left);
if (left > event->attr.sample_period)
--
2.38.1
