6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 80fb40baba19e25a1b6f3ecff6fc5c0171806bde ]
This is a follow-up to 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around
sk->sk_mark"). sk->sk_mark can be read and written without holding
the socket lock. IPv6 equivalent is already covered with READ_ONCE()
annotation in tcp_v6_send_response().
Fixes: 3c5b4d69c358 ("net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_mark")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f459d1fc44f205e13f6d8bdca2c8bfb9902ffac9.1736244569.git.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index a7cd433a54c9..bcc2f1e090c7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
sock_net_set(ctl_sk, net);
if (sk) {
ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
- inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : sk->sk_mark;
+ inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_mark);
ctl_sk->sk_priority = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
inet_twsk(sk)->tw_priority : READ_ONCE(sk->sk_priority);
transmit_time = tcp_transmit_time(sk);
--
2.39.5
