On 2025/1/13 17:24, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:22:05AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 07:49:23AM -0800, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>> For WCN6855, board ID specific NVM needs to be downloaded once board ID
>>> is available, but the default NVM is always downloaded currently, and
>>> the wrong NVM causes poor RF performance which effects user experience.
>>>
>>> Fix by downloading board ID specific NVM if board ID is available.
>
>>> Fixes: 095327fede00 ("Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for QTI Bluetooth chip wcn6855")
>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.4
>>> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@xxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> I will help to backport it to LTS kernels ASAP once this commit
>>> is mainlined.
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Correct subject and commit message
>>> - Temporarily add nvm fallback logic to speed up backport.
>>> — Add fix/stable tags as suggested by Luiz and Johan
>>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241113-x13s_wcn6855_fix-v1-1-15af0aa2549c@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> The board-specific NVM configuration files have now been included in the
>> linux-firmware-20241210 release and are making their way into the
>> distros (e.g. Arch Linux ARM and Fedora now ship them).
>>
>> Could we get this merged for 6.13-rc (and backported) so that Lenovo
>> ThinkPad X13s users can finally enjoy excellent Bluetooth range? :)
>
> This fix is still pending in your queue (I hope) and I was hoping you
> would be able to get it into 6.13-rc. The reason, apart from this being
> a crucial fix for users of this chipset, was also to avoid any conflicts
> with the new "rampatch" firmware name feature (which will also
> complicate backporting somewhat).
>
> Those patches were resent on January 7 and have now been merged for 6.14
> (presumably):
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250107092650.498154-1-quic_chejiang@xxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> How do we handle this? Can you still get this fix into 6.13 or is it
> now, as I assume, too late for that?
>
> Zijun, depending on Luiz' reply, can you look into rebasing on top of the
> patches now queued for linux-next?
>
sure. let me do it with high priority.
> Johan
