Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/eventfd: ensure io_eventfd_signal() defers another" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/12/25 2:16 AM, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
> 
> git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
> git checkout FETCH_HEAD
> git cherry-pick -x c9a40292a44e78f71258b8522655bffaf5753bdb
> # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
> git commit -s
> git send-email --to '<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>' --in-reply-to '2025011246-appealing-angler-4f22@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

And here's the 6.1 version.

-- 
Jens Axboe
From a812a6531595d7e0412c4f05ede6032f04c86ef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 11:16:13 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/eventfd: ensure io_eventfd_signal() defers another
 RCU period

Commit c9a40292a44e78f71258b8522655bffaf5753bdb upstream.

io_eventfd_do_signal() is invoked from an RCU callback, but when
dropping the reference to the io_ev_fd, it calls io_eventfd_free()
directly if the refcount drops to zero. This isn't correct, as any
potential freeing of the io_ev_fd should be deferred another RCU grace
period.

Just call io_eventfd_put() rather than open-code the dec-and-test and
free, which will correctly defer it another RCU grace period.

Fixes: 21a091b970cd ("io_uring: signal registered eventfd to process deferred task work")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 9b58ba4616d4..480752fc3eb6 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -479,6 +479,13 @@ static __cold void io_queue_deferred(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	}
 }
 
+static void io_eventfd_free(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+{
+	struct io_ev_fd *ev_fd = container_of(rcu, struct io_ev_fd, rcu);
+
+	eventfd_ctx_put(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
+	kfree(ev_fd);
+}
 
 static void io_eventfd_ops(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 {
@@ -492,10 +499,8 @@ static void io_eventfd_ops(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	 * ordering in a race but if references are 0 we know we have to free
 	 * it regardless.
 	 */
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ev_fd->refs)) {
-		eventfd_ctx_put(ev_fd->cq_ev_fd);
-		kfree(ev_fd);
-	}
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ev_fd->refs))
+		call_rcu(&ev_fd->rcu, io_eventfd_free);
 }
 
 static void io_eventfd_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
-- 
2.47.1


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux