On 10/01/2025 08:44, Christian Hewitt wrote:
This reverts commit bfbc68e4d8695497f858a45a142665e22a512ea3. The patch does permit the offending YUV420 @ 59.94 phy_freq and vclk_freq mode to match in calculations. It also results in all fractional rates being unavailable for use. This was unintended and requires the patch to be reverted. Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c index 2a942dc6a6dc..2a82119eb58e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c @@ -790,13 +790,13 @@ meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int phy_freq, FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].pixel_freq)); DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d phy_freq = %d alt = %d\n", i, params[i].phy_freq, - FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000); + FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10); /* Match strict frequency */ if (phy_freq == params[i].phy_freq && vclk_freq == params[i].vclk_freq) return MODE_OK; /* Match 1000/1001 variant */ - if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000) && + if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10) && vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].vclk_freq)) return MODE_OK; } @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ void meson_vclk_setup(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int target,for (freq = 0 ; params[freq].pixel_freq ; ++freq) {if ((phy_freq == params[freq].phy_freq || - phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/1000)*1000) && + phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/10)*10) && (vclk_freq == params[freq].vclk_freq || vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].vclk_freq))) { if (vclk_freq != params[freq].vclk_freq)
I wonder if a Fixes is also required here
