Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:12:50 -0800
Cc: <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daejun Park <daejun7.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5df3cb168d367719ae5c378029a90f6337d00e79.1736380252.git.quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1

On 1/8/2025 3:55 PM, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:

According to the UFS Device Specification, the bUFSFeaturesSupport

I will correct the bUFSFeaturesSupport to dExtendedUFSFeaturesSupport inthe next revision.


Thanks, Bao

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions
  - From: Avri Altman

References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions
  - From: Bao D. Nguyen

Prev by Date: [PATCH] mm: zswap: properly synchronize freeing resources during CPU hotunplug
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in __lookup_slow (3)
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: core: Fix the HIGH/LOW_TEMP Bit Definitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux