6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fa5c4ba8cdbfd2c2d6422e001311c8213283ebbf ]
WARN_ON() is called in the IO path. And it could lead to a warning
storm. Use WARN_ON_ONCE() instead of WARN_ON().
Fixes: 12542f1de179 ("RDMA/hns: Refactor process about opcode in post_send()")
Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220055249.146943-4-huangjunxian6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
index 60628ef1c46e..23667cfbf8e7 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static inline int set_ud_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *qp,
valid_num_sge = calc_wr_sge_num(wr, &msg_len);
ret = set_ud_opcode(ud_sq_wqe, wr);
- if (WARN_ON(ret))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
return ret;
ud_sq_wqe->msg_len = cpu_to_le32(msg_len);
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline int set_rc_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *qp,
rc_sq_wqe->msg_len = cpu_to_le32(msg_len);
ret = set_rc_opcode(hr_dev, rc_sq_wqe, wr);
- if (WARN_ON(ret))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
return ret;
hr_reg_write(rc_sq_wqe, RC_SEND_WQE_SO,
--
2.39.5
