6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
commit fca432e73db2bec0fdbfbf6d98d3ebcd5388a977 upstream.
The following sysfs entries are reading super block member directly,
which can have a different endian and cause wrong values:
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/nodesize
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/sectorsize
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/clone_alignment
Thankfully those values (nodesize and sectorsize) are always aligned
inside the btrfs_super_block, so it won't trigger unaligned read errors,
just endian problems.
Fix them by using the native cached members instead.
Fixes: df93589a1737 ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
@@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_nodesize_show(struc
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->nodesize);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->nodesize);
}
BTRFS_ATTR(, nodesize, btrfs_nodesize_show);
@@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_sectorsize_show(str
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->sectorsize);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->sectorsize);
}
BTRFS_ATTR(, sectorsize, btrfs_sectorsize_show);
@@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_clone_alignment_sho
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = to_fs_info(kobj);
- return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->super_copy->sectorsize);
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", fs_info->sectorsize);
}
BTRFS_ATTR(, clone_alignment, btrfs_clone_alignment_show);
