6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 7d0d673627e20cfa3b21a829a896ce03b58a4f1c upstream.
Currently, the pointer stored in call->prog_array is loaded in
__uprobe_perf_func(), with no RCU annotation and no immediately visible
RCU protection, so it looks as if the loaded pointer can immediately be
dangling.
Later, bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe() starts a RCU-trace read-side critical
section, but this is too late. It then uses rcu_dereference_check(), but
this use of rcu_dereference_check() does not actually dereference anything.
Fix it by aligning the semantics to bpf_prog_run_array(): Let the caller
provide rcu_read_lock_trace() protection and then load call->prog_array
with rcu_dereference_check().
This issue seems to be theoretical: I don't know of any way to reach this
code without having handle_swbp() further up the stack, which is already
holding a rcu_read_lock_trace() lock, so where we take
rcu_read_lock_trace() in __uprobe_perf_func()/bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe()
doesn't actually have any effect.
Fixes: 8c7dcb84e3b7 ("bpf: implement sleepable uprobes by chaining gps")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241210-bpf-fix-uprobe-uaf-v4-1-5fc8959b2b74@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 13 +++++--------
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2157,26 +2157,25 @@ bpf_prog_run_array(const struct bpf_prog
* rcu-protected dynamically sized maps.
*/
static __always_inline u32
-bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu,
+bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog)
{
const struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
const struct bpf_prog *prog;
- const struct bpf_prog_array *array;
struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx;
u32 ret = 1;
might_fault();
+ RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_trace_held(), "no rcu lock held");
+
+ if (unlikely(!array))
+ return ret;
- rcu_read_lock_trace();
migrate_disable();
run_ctx.is_uprobe = true;
- array = rcu_dereference_check(array_rcu, rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
- if (unlikely(!array))
- goto out;
old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
item = &array->items[0];
while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) {
@@ -2191,9 +2190,7 @@ bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct b
rcu_read_unlock();
}
bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
-out:
migrate_enable();
- rcu_read_unlock_trace();
return ret;
}
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1400,9 +1400,13 @@ static void __uprobe_perf_func(struct tr
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
if (bpf_prog_array_valid(call)) {
+ const struct bpf_prog_array *array;
u32 ret;
- ret = bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(call->prog_array, regs, bpf_prog_run);
+ rcu_read_lock_trace();
+ array = rcu_dereference_check(call->prog_array, rcu_read_lock_trace_held());
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(array, regs, bpf_prog_run);
+ rcu_read_unlock_trace();
if (!ret)
return;
}
