[PATCH 6.12 078/172] bpf,perf: Fix invalid prog_array access in perf_event_detach_bpf_prog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 978c4486cca5c7b9253d3ab98a88c8e769cb9bbd upstream.

Syzbot reported [1] crash that happens for following tracing scenario:

  - create tracepoint perf event with attr.inherit=1, attach it to the
    process and set bpf program to it
  - attached process forks -> chid creates inherited event

    the new child event shares the parent's bpf program and tp_event
    (hence prog_array) which is global for tracepoint

  - exit both process and its child -> release both events
  - first perf_event_detach_bpf_prog call will release tp_event->prog_array
    and second perf_event_detach_bpf_prog will crash, because
    tp_event->prog_array is NULL

The fix makes sure the perf_event_detach_bpf_prog checks prog_array
is valid before it tries to remove the bpf program from it.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z1MR6dCIKajNS6nU@krava/T/#m91dbf0688221ec7a7fc95e896a7ef9ff93b0b8ad

Fixes: 0ee288e69d03 ("bpf,perf: Fix perf_event_detach_bpf_prog error handling")
Reported-by: syzbot+2e0d2840414ce817aaac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241208142507.1207698-1-jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2215,6 +2215,9 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct p
 		goto unlock;
 
 	old_array = bpf_event_rcu_dereference(event->tp_event->prog_array);
+	if (!old_array)
+		goto put;
+
 	ret = bpf_prog_array_copy(old_array, event->prog, NULL, 0, &new_array);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog);
@@ -2223,6 +2226,7 @@ void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct p
 		bpf_prog_array_free_sleepable(old_array);
 	}
 
+put:
 	/*
 	 * It could be that the bpf_prog is not sleepable (and will be freed
 	 * via normal RCU), but is called from a point that supports sleepable






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux