Re: [PATCH v2] mm: cma: fix CMA aligned offset calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
>> non-zero order_per_bit values.
>>
>> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
>> 0x2f800000 and align_order=12, the function returns
>> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
>>
>> This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
> 
> When fixing a bug please always describe the end-user visible effects
> of that bug.
> 
> Without that information others are unable to understand why you are
> recommending a -stable backport.
> 

Thank you for the feedback. I had no crash logs to show, nevertheless, I
agree that a sentence describing potential effects of the bug would've
helped.

I'll keep that in mind for future submissions.

Best Regards,
Danesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]