6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 22368fe1f9bbf39db2b5b52859589883273e80ce upstream.
The condition in replenish_dl_new_period() that checks if a reservation
(dl_server) is deferred and is not handling a starvation case is
obviously wrong.
Fix it.
Fixes: a110a81c52a9 ("sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server")
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241127063740.8278-1-juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index d9d5a702f1a6..206691d35b7d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static inline void replenish_dl_new_period(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
* If it is a deferred reservation, and the server
* is not handling an starvation case, defer it.
*/
- if (dl_se->dl_defer & !dl_se->dl_defer_running) {
+ if (dl_se->dl_defer && !dl_se->dl_defer_running) {
dl_se->dl_throttled = 1;
dl_se->dl_defer_armed = 1;
}
--
2.47.1
