Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:55:38PM +0100: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.231 release. > There are 459 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:41:35 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.231-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Tested 2146a7485c27 ("Linux 5.10.231-rc1") on: - arm i.MX6ULL (Armadillo 640) - arm64 i.MX8MP (Armadillo G4) No obvious regression in dmesg or basic tests: Tested-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> > ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix the naming style for mask definition > > Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> > ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage > > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ASoC: fsl_micfil: use GENMASK to define register bit fields > > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ASoC: fsl_micfil: do not define SHIFT/MASK for single bits > > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read Just a note on these, our version (from nxp) of this was full of conflicts and too much effort to merge for something I cannot test easily, so I squashed out this part and re-cherry-picked just commits c808e277bcdf ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: Drop unnecessary register read") and 06df673d2023 ("ASoC: fsl_micfil: fix regmap_write_bits usage") The other three commits are marked as a stable dep of 06df673d2023 but it really is trivial to backport and not worth the risk to me; if you'd like me to send the minimal backport I used I'll be happy to. (but, as far as I'm concerned I'm fine as is as well and consider this closed; just reporting I didn't test this 100% as is. Not that my automated test actually exercises the micfil code anyway...) Thanks, -- Dominique Martinet
