Re: [PATCH 6.12 162/466] Revert "readahead: properly shorten readahead when falling back to do_page_cache_ra()"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 10:12:54AM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-12-12 at 15:55 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let
> > me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > commit a220d6b95b1ae12c7626283d7609f0a1438e6437 upstream.
> > 
> > This reverts commit 7c877586da3178974a8a94577b6045a48377ff25.
> 
> Isn't that moot now with 0938b1614648d5fbd832449a5a8a1b51d985323d that
> in Linus's tree? It's not in 6.12 (yet?).
> It may be worth backporting 0938b1614 to the stable tree, but it's
> beyond my pay grade.

I'll be glad to take it if someone says it is ok to do so (we need an
ack from mm developers to take anything they don't explicitly tag for
stable trees.)

thanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux