[PATCH 5.4 180/321] um/sysrq: remove needless variable sp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 3dd923f39a03dede001afe0edcc08613d5f403e5 ]

`sp' is a needless excercise here.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-36-dima@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: 0f659ff362ea ("um: Always dump trace for specified task in show_stack")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
index c71b5ef7ea8c3..c831a1c2eb94a 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops stackops = {
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
 {
-	unsigned long *sp = stack;
 	struct pt_regs *segv_regs = current->thread.segv_regs;
 	int i;
 
@@ -38,10 +37,9 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack)
 	}
 
 	if (!stack)
-		sp = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs);
+		stack = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs);
 
 	pr_info("Stack:\n");
-	stack = sp;
 	for (i = 0; i < 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE; i++) {
 		if (kstack_end(stack))
 			break;
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux