5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3ba44ee966bc3c41dd8a944f963466c8fcc60dc8 ]
When building the kernel with -Wmaybe-uninitialized, the compiler
reports this warning:
In function 'jffs2_mark_erased_block',
inlined from 'jffs2_erase_pending_blocks' at fs/jffs2/erase.c:116:4:
fs/jffs2/erase.c:474:9: warning: 'bad_offset' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
474 | jffs2_erase_failed(c, jeb, bad_offset);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/jffs2/erase.c: In function 'jffs2_erase_pending_blocks':
fs/jffs2/erase.c:402:18: note: 'bad_offset' was declared here
402 | uint32_t bad_offset;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
When mtd->point() is used, jffs2_erase_pending_blocks can return -EIO
without initializing bad_offset, which is later used at the filebad
label in jffs2_mark_erased_block.
Fix it by initializing this variable.
Fixes: 8a0f572397ca ("[JFFS2] Return values of jffs2_block_check_erase error paths")
Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/jffs2/erase.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jffs2/erase.c b/fs/jffs2/erase.c
index 7e9abdb897122..5fbaf6ab9f482 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/erase.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/erase.c
@@ -340,10 +340,9 @@ static int jffs2_block_check_erase(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_erasebl
} while(--retlen);
mtd_unpoint(c->mtd, jeb->offset, c->sector_size);
if (retlen) {
- pr_warn("Newly-erased block contained word 0x%lx at offset 0x%08tx\n",
- *wordebuf,
- jeb->offset +
- c->sector_size-retlen * sizeof(*wordebuf));
+ *bad_offset = jeb->offset + c->sector_size - retlen * sizeof(*wordebuf);
+ pr_warn("Newly-erased block contained word 0x%lx at offset 0x%08x\n",
+ *wordebuf, *bad_offset);
return -EIO;
}
return 0;
--
2.43.0
